Welcome to the Fall 2011 semester. Want to know how to do a better job of studying this semester? Check out this quick series of videos from a cognitive psychologist.
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Research: James Murray
James Murray's research is featured in the news.
Thousands of UW-La Crosse students will be moving onto campus this weekend. A study co-authored by a UW-L professor shows such a move could help them make the grade.
James Murray, UW-La Crosse assistant professor of economics, has found evidence that living on campus causes students to perform better academically.
The study of about 360 students at Indiana University-Purdue University found both an immediate effect and a more long-term effect of on-campus living. Students who were presently living on campus had a GPA from .3 to .9 higher than those who didn’t. Students who had once lived on campus continued to perform better academically even after moving off campus. Their GPA was from .3 to .5 higher.
“This may help universities take measures to improve their on-campus student life — to try to encourage behavior that leads to better academic performance,” says Murray.See the story in this Metro News online article.
Reasoning in Economics
Here is a discussion about behavioral econ, psych, and inductive versus deductive reasoning. It is wonderful throughout.
Labels:
Behavioral Economics,
BUS 230,
Deadweight Loss,
Eco 110,
ECO 120
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Lessons in Tax Incidence
Apparently FAA taxes are temporarily suspended since congress has failed to act on renewing them. And it appears airlines are charging rates as if they were still collecting the tax. Any student of economics will recognize this as an issue of tax incidence. The fact that the price to the consumer remains unchanged, suggests that the incidence of the tax fell entirely on the airlines (suppliers). Rather than being angry this is something to be happy about. It means that consumers weren't harmed by the FAA taxes in the first place, and it also means demand for flying is highly elastic. The quote at the end of the block below suggests this might be true:
Several aviation taxes expired after midnight Friday when Congress failed to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration, which collects the revenue. The suspended taxes could save passengers 10% to 15% on their ticket prices, but most U.S. carriers have boosted fares to the levels ticket prices would have been with the taxes still in place, allowing the airlines to take in roughly an extra $25 million a day, says Rick Seaney of FareCompare.com.
As of Tuesday, only Spirit and Alaska seemed to be bucking the trend, Seaney says.
Frequent fliers have noticed.
"While I respect any business' right to set prices as they see fit, this is another example of the airline 'gotcha game,'" says Steven Gordon, a sales manager who lives in Virginia Beach. "It is getting to the point that I feel better about buying a used car than an airline ticket."
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Dan Ariely and Qualtrics
An interesting interview with Dan Ariely in part about his use of surveys. Particularly interesting for students in Behavioral Econ and BUS 230. From the interview:
WHAT ADVICE DO YOU HAVE FOR MARKET RESEARCHERS?
What people do is not what they say. In general, most of our findings suggest that we should not think very highly of focus groups.
I suspect that many market research companies use focus groups because they want a statement to put in a PowerPoint presentation for a client. But the problem is that what people say doesn’t always reflect what they think or, even more important, the reasons for their actions.
SO, THE QUESTION IS, WHAT SHOULD YOU ASK?
You can ask people what they have done, or what they think they will do in the future. They can answer those questions. But, the moment you get into reasons, into why, interpreting their answers as correct becomes much more tricky.
It is also important to ask about categories that are ones which people can accurately quantify. The more concrete your response scale is, the more likely people are to answer your questions in an informative way.
HOW WOULD YOU RECOMMEND RESEARCHERS USE SCALES?
Take the question, “How often have you done X?”
If you create a scale from “very rarely” to “very frequently”, that’s not as useful as offering, “2 times last week” or “3 times last week”.
The more concrete you get, the more people feel inclined to answer accurately and honestly.
ANY MORE ADVICE ON HOW TO USE SCALES?
Often people use a 5-point response scale, but we find most people have an aversion to the extremes. This means that when we use a 5-point scale, effectively we are using a 3-point scale. That makes our sensitivity of our measurement less useful.
I would encourage researchers to think whether people will have that extreme aversion, and if that is the case, to have more levels. A continuous scale with just 2 anchors in the extremes in such cases is ideal.
Econ Major: What is it Worth?
What is the value of an Economics Major? A lot. The full report is here. The report includes all college majors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)